| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Pete Muller Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2001 Posts: 1950 Location: United States, California,
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Walt Gifford wrote: | | Come on Pete, was the ring tension more or less than a stock ring? |
Nobody wants to do their own testing, huh?
Stock rings are all over the place.
The finish on the ring changes it.
The finish on the cylinder bore changes it.
How you test changes it.
The measurements are relative, not absolute.
Set up an engine... see how much force it took to move the ring in the bore... run the engine. Make a change... see how much force to move the ring... run the engine. Rinse, lather, repeat.
Once you've done that many times, you'll have an absolute number... for your paticular way of measuring and your particular setup.
--------
| Quote: | | I've heard of formula Y engines you had to put a screw driver handle under the rear wheel so they wouldn't roll away 'cause the ring was so loose. |
Now that's a fish story if I ever heard one! -- ROFL!!
--------
| John M. wrote: | | Do I need a small fish scale or a large fish scale? |
If you use a 1-10 lb scale, you'll cover every ring in any condition in any bore. If you use a 0-5 lb scale, you'll have a much better idea of what's going on. A force gauge with very fine graduations works even better than a simple spring scale.
Once again though; giving a hard number is pretty meaningless due to all the variables. I always check mine vertically (pulling the piston down "with" gravity) in a lightly oiled bore (ring lapped, bore honed). Doesn't really matter how you check as long as you do it the same way every time.
For me, it's always been kind-of the "final check" of the ring, just to verify that what I "feel" pushing the piston back and forth is about right. Light checking the ring is very important, bore finish is very important, endgap doesn't mean much (as long as there's at least .010).
PM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Mulvihill
Joined: 14 Oct 2001 Posts: 1151 Location: United States, New York,
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 6:35 pm Post subject: Ring tension redux |
|
|
Thanks Pete!
Life is too short to do one's own testing<LOL>
Truthfully thank you for the direction. Now I (think I )understand what I'm looking for. From what I have found, initial ring tension allows you to start the engine. Pressure derived from the running combustion will allow for dynamic ring tension and actual compression. Now I have to find my middle ground.
Thank you.
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Muller Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2001 Posts: 1950 Location: United States, California,
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | From what I have found, initial ring tension allows you to start the engine. Pressure derived from the running combustion will allow for dynamic ring tension and actual compression. |
While I agree that pressure tends to "assist" in keeping the ring sealed against the bore, I'm quite certain that the effect is not nearly as pronounced on a "rail" ring (like a KT100) as it is in a dykes-style ring (aka; "L" ring).
In my experience, the dykes rings can be run with much, much less static wall tension than a rail ring.
fwiw: I never had any problem starting an engine that had a dykes ring running virtually no static tension.
It's unfortunate that many engines have gotten away from the dykes ring (IMO). It's far superior, but I suspect the additional cost of the the ring, and the additional machine work required to the piston has something to do with it.
PM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bill W Johnson
Joined: 12 Aug 2005 Posts: 102 Location: United States, North Carolina, Hickory
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| How do you adjust the tension on the Ring???? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ted tucholski
Joined: 31 May 2003 Posts: 244 Location: United States, Arizona, Phoenix
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:15 pm Post subject: Make em tight |
|
|
I like to set my piston to cylinder clearence at .0015 to .002, I have also set them as tight as.001. You do need to break them in properly and take the time to do it right. This means track time. Many builders set them up looser so the customer can just go run them. The thing I like to stress on a rebuild is a light check of the ring against the cylinder wall. Place the ring about .015 below the top of the cylinder and hold it up to a light and see if the surface fit blocks the light out.
I am curious to here from other builders on ring size selection. I have begun to place the same ring size as is on the piston size and only go up a half size with piston at 05. 15. 25. etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Howard O'Chocke
Joined: 30 Aug 2002 Posts: 122 Location: United States, Ohio, Powell
|
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 1:43 pm Post subject: Hone This |
|
|
| I know this post is directed towards the KT100, but am wondering what to do to the cylinder when replacing a ring in a CR125 Nickasil cylinder. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Lewis
Joined: 29 Sep 2001 Posts: 794 Location: Afghanistan, The land of POPPIES!!!,
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Pete Muller wrote: | I have a Sunnen MBB-1660 floor model honing machine.
|
Pete,
Have you ever tried to hot hone a cylinder? It's becoming more and more common in big engines, and it really does turn into a better ring seal. Apparently, it's super mess. Just wondering if you've ever tried that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Muller Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2001 Posts: 1950 Location: United States, California,
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've honed cylinders that were hot to the point of needing a couple layers of rubber gloves to hold onto them.
Didn't see any difference.
I have a sketch somewhere in a notebook of my "next gen" system for honing -- it would've pumped heated oil into the exhaust port, and cold oil into the intake port. I never built it, but thought about it quite a bit.
Steve O'Hara and I discussed this a lot back in the 70's.
It really makes no sense to hone a cylinder (like a Yamaha) "hot". If you think about it... there is 1100° gas going out the exhaust port, and ambient air coming in the intake port, and probably somewhere around ambient air in the crankcase and going up the transfers. The temperature gradients around the cylinder are VERY difficult to simulate, or even predict.
Bottom line: I personally believe there's more to understanding how the cylinder gets distorted when the engine is assembled than there is in trying to simulate running temperatures during honing.
I was able to run a direct drive Yamaha at .0005 clearance with no trouble... which to me would indicate that there wasn't a whole lot of distortion happening that I wasn't able to simulate during honing. _________________ Muller Machine
How-to pages, tech documents, & more
Ultra-precision machining/blueprinting for engine builders |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve O'Hara
Joined: 02 Jan 2002 Posts: 1064 Location: United States, California,
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
And just to add to Pete's thoughts on the subject.... the greatest source of distortion in the whole assembly comes from the dynamic loads the engines generate within themselves during the combustion process and there is no way to measure that distortion but you can sure see evidence of it in some motors more than others. The issue is most pronounced in the engines that have cast in lron liners like the KT100s and more so in the old Macs.... much less of a problem in the higher quality european motors. I have always liked Pete's approach which I would characterize as making the motor as perfect as possible in a static condition at room temp with everything bolted on and left on if possible or simulated if not.
One more thought on the subject of cross hatch and oil retention.... I got the best results in the Macs with an ultra fine honing approach that was almost cross hatch free and looked like the cylinder was almost polished. We used thin tool steel rings that had no chrome and a lot of care was taken to select rings that fit perfectly so there was no break in time at all. I usually ran a motor for just one or two laps very rich before going to full speed. I never saw any evidence that the lack of cross hatch had any effect on cylinder wall lubrication but it should be noted that we would run around 4.5 gallons of alky through the motor in an hour and the oil content was high so there was a lot of oil going through the motors compared to the modern gas burning setups.
Steve O'Hara |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Lewis
Joined: 29 Sep 2001 Posts: 794 Location: Afghanistan, The land of POPPIES!!!,
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
For whatever reason, in a V8, hot honing the block seems to make a noticeable difference in ring seal, especially after the engine gets a couple hours under their belts. The difference may simply be an issue of real estate. If you have a long bore, it's hard to keep the cylindricity. On a smaller stroke engine, it's just less cylinder to deal with.
I see what you mean about the exhaust on one side and the intake on the other. It seems like that would be a huge player in terms of cylinder distortion.
From what I've heard from an engine guy in a race shop, Honda has the best cylinder bore machining control. He said that some of their production stuff is better than they can produce on a race engine. They hone a 4 cylinder engine in something like 15 seconds. It's just amazing at the precision that some companies can produce. When was the last time someone had trouble with a Honda block? I've never heard of one. I've seen blocks out of an old CVCC with 200,000 miles on them that still had crosshatch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Larry Andrews
Joined: 13 May 2002 Posts: 2852 Location: United States, California, SC Mtns
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tim Lewis wrote: | | For whatever reason, in a V8, hot honing the block seems to make a noticeable difference in ring seal, especially after the engine gets a couple hours under their belts. The difference may simply be an issue of real estate. If you have a long bore, it's hard to keep the cylindricity. On a smaller stroke engine, it's just less cylinder to deal with. |
Tim,
Out of curiosity, what's the basic design of those V-8 blocks? Solid cast iron? Iron sleeves in aluminum? Nikasil plating on aluminum?
Maybe I'll try to find out if it's possible to do Moire inside a cylinder...could produce some interesting data. We got some amazing feedback on PCB and chip package planarity drivers that way.
tks. la |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bill W Johnson
Joined: 12 Aug 2005 Posts: 102 Location: United States, North Carolina, Hickory
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Who can hard chrome a Mac Cylinder correctly to build it back up??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Lewis
Joined: 29 Sep 2001 Posts: 794 Location: Afghanistan, The land of POPPIES!!!,
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Larry Andrews wrote: |
Tim,
Out of curiosity, what's the basic design of those V-8 blocks? Solid cast iron? Iron sleeves in aluminum? Nikasil plating on aluminum?
Maybe I'll try to find out if it's possible to do Moire inside a cylinder...could produce some interesting data. We got some amazing feedback on PCB and chip package planarity drivers that way.
tks. la |
The stuff that I'm presently working with is an Aluminum block, iron liner. It's the GM LS2 block in race trim.
The aluminum/iron difference may be some of the issue, I don't know. Getting the honing just right does seem to make an difference in power and the longevity of that power. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ron LaFollette
Joined: 30 Dec 2001 Posts: 148 Location: United States, Michigan,
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Walt Gifford wrote: | It's not rocket science and, you don't need a big sunnen machine.
My hone is an Ammco 3950 small engine hone and, I don't use the 2 felts but, instead use 4 stones. I believe it is stone set #3952-1 and they are the finest stones made for that hone.
Giffy  |
Where do you get replacement stones for your hone? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KURT RODGERS
Joined: 01 Dec 2001 Posts: 74 Location: United States, Illinois,
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Couple of things to consider:
"torque plates" do not instantly distort the cylinder. Bolt the plates on in the morning and do not hone until after lunch or set it up at the end of the day and then hone the next morning. don't forget plates over the exhaust and intake mounts.
Hot hone - go to Salvation Army or Good Will and buy a electric skillet. Band saw off the sides and keep the flat bottom and the control. There is usually enough room inside the heating element loop to drill the head bolt pattern. Bolt it on with the torque plate (see above) . Before you go to hone plug it in and set to a temp (I did mine at 350º). When the light goes off start honing and let the control the on/off while you hone. You might want one top and bottom and try different temp splits. Plus they make your shop smell like pancakes.
Best honing oil - half kerosene half transmission fluid. Pumped liberally while honing. I have used a big plastic storage container and a "Little Giant" fountain pump. Bolt the cylinder/torque plate set up to a heavy chunk of steel and set it in the storage tank, turn on the pump and aim at the cylinder and hone away.
PS on hot hone - test measure the cylinder and piston cold and then at hone temp to determine growth. You will need to use a slightly different number when checking hot. Example the cylinder may grow .003 and the piston may only grow .002.
Last edited by KURT RODGERS on Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Go Top
|