EKN Platinum Forum - Russell
2D2W - LB
HOME - NEWS - FEATURES - DRIVERS - PR WIRE - FORUMS - MULTIMEDIA - PHOTOS - SCHEDULES - RESULTS - LINKS - INTERNATIONAL NEWS - NEW TO KARTING - CONTACT

MRP - SS


Gent Racing - Button


EKN Store - T Shirts






Comet Kart Sales - Button


ART Grand Prix America

KG Plastics - FB
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Login to check your private messagesLogin to check your private messages   LoginLogin 
Spindle lessons
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    eKartingNews.com Forum Index -> General Karting Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Robert Daniel



Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 119

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:00 am    Post subject: spindles Reply with quote

I'm a little confused. Since all steel has essentially the same modulus, spindles made of 1018, 4130, 8620, would all behave the same.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gary Lawson



Joined: 21 Aug 2001
Posts: 542

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:24 am    Post subject: re Reply with quote

The big 25mm spindles must be hollow given they are noticeably lighter than a 17mm spindle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kyle luttrell



Joined: 22 Apr 2011
Posts: 35
Location: United States, Georgia, white

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes those maybe hollow but they are made of a better grade steel. The hollow them to lighten them up.

No a hollow axle isn't stronger then a solid axle if both are made of same material lol [/list]
_________________
Kyle Luttrell
www.Luttrellracing.com
Ionic Edge
Kyle@luttrellracing.com

https://www.facebook.com/IonicEdgeChassis
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mike clements



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 232
Location: United States, Arizona, San Tan Valley

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Robert, Those materials you listed act completely different in the real world.
Kyle, I know better. I, and many people before me, have actually tested this theory. I learned this first about 33 years ago when my new Emmick kart came with a solid 1.250" axle. Within a month, they sent me a new hollow axle that was stiffer. The materials were the same according to Gary Emmick. It had a .250" wall thickness. The .188" wall axles flexed too much.
Don't get me wrong. I am not arguing with you. This is common engineering knowledge.
_________________
Began kart racing 1959. Made many friends along the way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kyle luttrell



Joined: 22 Apr 2011
Posts: 35
Location: United States, Georgia, white

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey,
Well ill tell you want ill do..

Ill get two solid 1'x1" 4130 chromoly and hollow one out and do a test...

Are you a betting man?

500$ to you if the solid one bends before the hollow one ??
_________________
Kyle Luttrell
www.Luttrellracing.com
Ionic Edge
Kyle@luttrellracing.com

https://www.facebook.com/IonicEdgeChassis
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mike clements



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 232
Location: United States, Arizona, San Tan Valley

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How large is the I.D. of the hole ? Remember, we discussed this already.
Here's what you do. You go ahead with your game and I'll go with what I know works. Good Luck to you.
MC
"Began Kart racing in 1959"
"12 years working for GM Engineering staff"
Born into a racing family.
4 National Championships as a driver.
70+ National Championships as an engine builder.
Published author
Holder of 3 U.S. Patents on internal combustion engine design.
World Land Speed Record holder for 4 cycle karts.

You ?
_________________
Began kart racing 1959. Made many friends along the way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Gary Lawson



Joined: 21 Aug 2001
Posts: 542

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:45 pm    Post subject: r Reply with quote

I was just stating what may not be obvious to some. No one needs to start puffing chests out. Winter is almost over so we can get back to letting results speak again. The past is over.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kyle luttrell



Joined: 22 Apr 2011
Posts: 35
Location: United States, Georgia, white

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you think I just went out and spent 1000's if dollars without testing?

Lol right Smile lol

I don't gamble lol

You are deffantly respected in the go kart industry.

I'm also a ff... A wise chief once told me if you have to tap on your badge/accomplishments then it means nothing.

I don't claim to know it all or have done it all but ill sure die hard trying!
_________________
Kyle Luttrell
www.Luttrellracing.com
Ionic Edge
Kyle@luttrellracing.com

https://www.facebook.com/IonicEdgeChassis
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Michael Purnell



Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mike clements wrote:
Robert, Those materials you listed act completely different in the real world.
Kyle, I know better. I, and many people before me, have actually tested this theory. I learned this first about 33 years ago when my new Emmick kart came with a solid 1.250" axle. Within a month, they sent me a new hollow axle that was stiffer. The materials were the same according to Gary Emmick. It had a .250" wall thickness. The .188" wall axles flexed too much.
Don't get me wrong. I am not arguing with you. This is common engineering knowledge.


Mr. Clements,
Please provide us with some sort of references for the theory that a hollow shaft is stiffer than a solid shaft. If it is a "common engineering knowledge" this shouldn't be too difficult for you.

Are you maybe trying to say that a hollow shaft has a better strength-to-weight ratio than a solid shaft? If this is what you are saying than I will agree with you as THIS is a well known engineering principle but your previous posts seem to be stating that a hollow shaft will be stiffer than a solid shaft with the only parameters being that the shafts are of the same material and outside diameter.

If that is what you are saying I respectfully ask for a reference, i think we would all like to see one.

I think that you are confusing strength-to-weight ratio with simply "strength".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mike clements



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 232
Location: United States, Arizona, San Tan Valley

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

oops Embarassed
_________________
Began kart racing 1959. Made many friends along the way.


Last edited by mike clements on Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mike clements



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 232
Location: United States, Arizona, San Tan Valley

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very Happy I just noticed that Margay is building a new offset kart for dirt oval racing. Their front spindle arrangement is quite nice and innovative. They also advertise that the material they are using is 8620, just like I did when building mine.
What are you using ?

The only reason I posted anything about past accomplishments is because by far the readers on this site are 2 cycle racers and mostly TaG racers. They are much younger than myself and therefore have no idea as to who Mike Clements is. I am not bragging. When I get as many National wins as Lynn Haddock, Kyle Adkins or Ronnie Emmick, maybe Then I'll brag.

While working for GM Engineering Staff, we used a lot of strain gauges to test various materials and sizes. On sway bars and torsion bars, there is no doubt at all that the hollow tube is stronger and resists twisting more than the solid. NASCAR sway bars and roll bars are tubular as are in just about any form of racing. It's not a weight thing either. If the sanctioning body thought solid was stronger, they would mandate solid.

We did the exact tests you may be thinking of by placing solid bars of steel, various alloys, in a hyd press with a pressure gauge. Apply pressure to them and measure the deflection at the center of the rod. Let's say a 2" diameter for example. Then try a 2" diameter tube of the same alloy. In every case, the tube resisted the pressure better than the solid bar.

Again, I am not going to argue with anyone. My list of accomplishments is my proof. This worked for me and General Motors and NASCAR and Indy Car and Formula 1 and SCCA, etc. You do what works for you and I'll do what works for me.
_________________
Began kart racing 1959. Made many friends along the way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
joseph hollinger



Joined: 12 Sep 2002
Posts: 9469
Location: United States, California, san francisco

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can find an online calculator for tubing deflection here: http://www.calculatoredge.com/civil%20engg%20calculator/beam.htm

I entered the data for two tubes. Both 1" OD and 100" long. Both subject to a 100 pound load. Both steel. One solid, one hollow with a .1" wall thickness. As you can see, the hollow tube bends a lot more than the solid tube.


_________________
A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. -- Winston Churchill.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mike clements



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 232
Location: United States, Arizona, San Tan Valley

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joe, Just for fun, please enter 1.250" O.D. with a .250" wall thickness.
Then compare that to a wall thickness of .188".
These are common numbers for American 1 1/4" axles. Length is 42" for spring racing.

Also, I noticed 70,000 more PSI on the tube as compared to the stress on the solid bar ?
thank you, Mike
_________________
Began kart racing 1959. Made many friends along the way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
joseph hollinger



Joined: 12 Sep 2002
Posts: 9469
Location: United States, California, san francisco

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Everything else being equal, the tube with the .188 wall bends about .1 more for a 100 pound load.

The field marked "bending stress" is value calculated to reflect the difference in tension at the top of the tube compared to compression at the bottom of the tube. The more a tube is deflected, the greater than value should be.
_________________
A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. -- Winston Churchill.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bob prinzo



Joined: 18 Dec 2010
Posts: 43
Location: United States, California, sacramento

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

id like to know which one of you guys argueing with mike are actual educated engineers.
_________________
GP9/leopard no.47

wildkart/HPV1 no.10
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    eKartingNews.com Forum Index -> General Karting Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Go Top
Copyright © 2002 - 2013 Ekartingnews.com. All Rights Reserved.       Maintained by Holbi LLP
DB time: 0.167572 (43.28%), total time:0.387151, queries:38