EKN Platinum Forum - Russell
KartSport North America - LB
HOME - NEWS - FEATURES - DRIVERS - PR WIRE - FORUMS - MULTIMEDIA - PHOTOS - SCHEDULES - RESULTS - LINKS - INTERNATIONAL NEWS - NEW TO KARTING - CONTACT

Ribtect - SS (non-flash)


Gent Racing - Button


Go Racing Magazine - Button


Team CRP


Comet Kart Sales - Button


3G Kart Racing


EFCN Insider

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Login to check your private messagesLogin to check your private messages   LoginLogin 
Nov. Fastrack. Let the weight complaints begin
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    eKartingNews.com Forum Index -> Autocross / Solo 2
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tim Walsh



Joined: 12 Sep 2011
Posts: 64
Location: United States, North Carolina, Winston-Salem

PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:59 pm    Post subject: Nov. Fastrack. Let the weight complaints begin Reply with quote

Looks like the november fastrack is out:
http://www.scca.com:8080/assets/11-fastrack-nov-solo.pdf

ITEM 37) Change 19.1.D.1.f.2:
“2. Non-OE Ignition: Non-OE Capacitive Discharge Ignition (CDI) may be used provided that the stator, rotor and
flywheel (including any wires and connectors) must be OE and may not move by any remote device. Furthermore,
the ignition system may not control the fuel induction system in any manner. Ignition interrupt systems (e.g., speed
shift and no lift shift systems) are specifically disallowed. The CDI must be normally commercially available over
the counter in the USA to all competitors. Use of any non-OE ignition CDI, programmable or pre-programmed,
incurs a 25-lb weight penalty.”
FasTrack May 2011
ITEM 3Cool Change the first paragraph of 19.1.D.2 to read as follows:
“2. KZ (ICC): All current or prior approved CIK-FIA engines are allowed. Engine must be a liquid-cooled, single-cylinder,
125 cc design with a single reed-valve circuit. All engine, intake, exhaust, ignition, and transmission components
must be CIK-FIA homologated except where otherwise specified. However, components may be interchanged
between model years of the same engine manufacturer and brand. Karts with ICC engines must conform to
chassis, braking, wheel, and tire regulations of the SCCA Solo Rules Section 19.1 and incur an additional 25 lb
weight adjustment.”
FasTrack May 2011
ITEM 39) Change the class name designation of F125 to Kart Modified (KM).

Cliffs Notes: Stock Ignition 385 PI/ICC 410?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joe Ricard



Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 882
Location: United States, Mississippi,

PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This has been discussed here to the point of people getting all red in the face.

Now I only have to bolt 50 pounds of lead to my ICC. If I wasn't such a skinny azz it would be less. No worries. I need to learn to drive better before I complain about weight.

And I am working on that.
_________________
Arrow AX-8/ Rotax Sr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tim Walsh



Joined: 12 Sep 2011
Posts: 64
Location: United States, North Carolina, Winston-Salem

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've read through most of those threads, hence the title. I'm too new to say yeah or nay on how well they are going to to work. Just means I either need to bolt on some lead, or remove the PI module. I'm thinking of removing the module.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Trey Davis



Joined: 10 Jun 2010
Posts: 78
Location: United States, Tennessee, Knoxville

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 4:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's only 5 lbs. Hell, if you take a big crap before you run, that's 5 lbs right there. I don't see this making much difference. I do like the KM designation much better.
_________________
05CRG/99Honda
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tim Walsh



Joined: 12 Sep 2011
Posts: 64
Location: United States, North Carolina, Winston-Salem

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 5:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trey Davis wrote:
It's only 5 lbs. Hell, if you take a big crap before you run, that's 5 lbs right there. I don't see this making much difference. I do like the KM designation much better.


True it's only 5lbs, but I've been kicking around the idea to swap over the SI since I bought the kart. Just more incentive to do so. As a timing and scoring chief I love the KM designation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tom Reynolds



Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 555
Location: United States, New Mexico, Albuquerque

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 6:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think too many people have any right to complain at this point considering how few letters we have received on all the topics in the last year. Despite all the chatter here, it's almost like no one cares.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Dale Seeley



Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 524
Location: United States, Georgia, Marietta

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 6:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

We don't make the rules, we follow them. Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tom Reynolds



Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 555
Location: United States, New Mexico, Albuquerque

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 7:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dale Seeley wrote:
We don't make the rules, we follow them. Cool


I know it's a joke but in truth its completely the other way around. The members make the rules if they want to, otherwise the KAC/SEB does their best without guidance of what the membership wants. However when we get 2-3 letters on average for each item in fastrack out for member comment, I'm guessing everyone is ok with that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Jason Vehige



Joined: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 282
Location: United States, Tennessee, Nashville

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nothing should be a huge surprise for anyone who has been paying attention..... Cool
_________________
Jason Vehige

08 Gillard Charlotte / SGM sl204
05 Vanspeed Sirio / SGM sl204
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Brian Garfield



Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 667
Location: United States, Maryland, SKCA Racing!

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 7:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are more items that should've been in that Fastrack (re: Junior rules) but got overlooked. Mostly stuff that everyone who's been paying attention know about:
1) Junior designations being JA, JB, and JC
2) Junior Spec Tire being the MG Red/HZ
3) Required redundancy on brake cable
4) Elimination of Methanol from FJA

Brian
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joe Ricard



Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 882
Location: United States, Mississippi,

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Methanol from FJA??
I missed that one.

How about spec motors???
_________________
Arrow AX-8/ Rotax Sr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Danny Kao



Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 192

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joe Ricard wrote:
How about spec motors???


Spec motor proposal is in the works. The current baselines are:

1. For National events only; does not apply to local events.
2. One motor for both JA and JB, with throttle cable restrictions.
3. On board starter.
4. Reduction of noise level.

A draft version of the proposal will be presented at the next KAC meeting in December. Look for the fastrack in the following month for see the details. In the mean time, if you have any suggestions and concerns, please write your letter to SEB/KAC. Just to echo what Tom said, we read every letter and that's the official vehicle for suggestion and rule changes. KAC is not the only folks that read these letters, SEB and National stuffs all read these letters with us, and for what I know they probably don't read EKN. So letters, letters, letters. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Larry MacLeod



Joined: 28 Sep 2005
Posts: 299
Location: United States, Michigan, Ypsilanti

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 7:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting...
The "November" fastrack email I received actually linked the solo/SEB portion to the October fastrack. Guess I shouldn't trust National Office email I receive.

But it was October that mentioned the "spec" engine proposal for FJ @ National events. Which reminded me I need to write another letter...

Spec engine? You guys are smokin' something.


Larry
_________________
F125 #196
Old Birel/ hodgepodge Honda CR125
Lefty Funk
Detroit Region
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andrew Peppler



Joined: 08 Aug 2010
Posts: 91

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It feels (this is how I'm interpreting it) like the spec engine is not a matter of if it happens, it sounds like only a matter of when it will happen. Again, this is how I'm taking it but I wrote a letter against it.
Basically:
1) Engines are quite equal with current rules (except Raptor in FJA). FJA can get it done with KT100/Rotax/WF and FJB has the Raptor and restricted KT100 fairly equal. Not sure about restricted WF in FJB as I don't think most are running this package.
2) WF racers/engine builders are not anywhere close to me... so what do I do when I have motor issues? Spend $$$ to ship it a few states over?
3) WF is a $1,000 engine which was way above my budget when my son started earlier this year. It is $1,500 for a blueprinted WF from one source I found. This high entry cost might of deterred me from putting him in the kart. I spent $450 for a used local KT100 w/ clutch which I thought was a lot at the time.
4)Local tracks only have limited Animal/Clone programs but high Rotax and KT100 programs. There is no WF sprint classes that I know of in my area. So I would have to have a second kart ready for sprint racing. This is actually a big deal to me because I bought our package that uses the same so I specifically could haul it to an autox one weekend and the track the next weekend.
5)Availability makes things cheaper. If the local track races KT100's then there are plenty of used parts and engines to make things easier and cheaper.

Again, these are my thoughts. I guess $1,500 will be the standard for a national FJ kart motor since most will probably blueprint to some extent. Maybe there is more of a used market then I am aware of... I just checked ebay and only found new motors available from $955 to $1049 w/o shipping.

Kids should just go out and have fun is whatever package works best for the kid/parent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Danny Kao



Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 192

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Currently, the ratio of letters are 6:1 in favor of a spec motor for Juniors. The rationales in favor ranging from fair competition, noise reduction, and on board starter. These are pretty legitimate concerns not only to the karting class, but across the entire autocross classes. The folks who wrote the letters in favor of a spec motor are all current FJ parents or had kids that ran FJs before; some with WF, and some don't.

What we need are your letters to voice your opinion, and I am hoping to see different solutions that would address noise and stall on course. I think these are the issues that impacts everyone and ought to be address anyway and your suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    eKartingNews.com Forum Index -> Autocross / Solo 2 All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Go Top
Copyright © 2002 - 2013 Ekartingnews.com. All Rights Reserved.       Maintained by Holbi LLP
DB time: 0.196909 (43.56%), total time:0.452078, queries:38