| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Robert Daniel
Joined: 26 Oct 2008 Posts: 119
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:00 am Post subject: spindles |
|
|
| I'm a little confused. Since all steel has essentially the same modulus, spindles made of 1018, 4130, 8620, would all behave the same. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary Lawson
Joined: 21 Aug 2001 Posts: 542
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:24 am Post subject: re |
|
|
| The big 25mm spindles must be hollow given they are noticeably lighter than a 17mm spindle |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kyle luttrell
Joined: 22 Apr 2011 Posts: 35 Location: United States, Georgia, white
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mike clements
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 235 Location: United States, Arizona, San Tan Valley
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Robert, Those materials you listed act completely different in the real world.
Kyle, I know better. I, and many people before me, have actually tested this theory. I learned this first about 33 years ago when my new Emmick kart came with a solid 1.250" axle. Within a month, they sent me a new hollow axle that was stiffer. The materials were the same according to Gary Emmick. It had a .250" wall thickness. The .188" wall axles flexed too much.
Don't get me wrong. I am not arguing with you. This is common engineering knowledge. _________________ Began kart racing 1959. Made many friends along the way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kyle luttrell
Joined: 22 Apr 2011 Posts: 35 Location: United States, Georgia, white
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mike clements
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 235 Location: United States, Arizona, San Tan Valley
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
How large is the I.D. of the hole ? Remember, we discussed this already.
Here's what you do. You go ahead with your game and I'll go with what I know works. Good Luck to you.
MC
"Began Kart racing in 1959"
"12 years working for GM Engineering staff"
Born into a racing family.
4 National Championships as a driver.
70+ National Championships as an engine builder.
Published author
Holder of 3 U.S. Patents on internal combustion engine design.
World Land Speed Record holder for 4 cycle karts.
You ? _________________ Began kart racing 1959. Made many friends along the way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary Lawson
Joined: 21 Aug 2001 Posts: 542
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:45 pm Post subject: r |
|
|
| I was just stating what may not be obvious to some. No one needs to start puffing chests out. Winter is almost over so we can get back to letting results speak again. The past is over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kyle luttrell
Joined: 22 Apr 2011 Posts: 35 Location: United States, Georgia, white
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you think I just went out and spent 1000's if dollars without testing?
Lol right lol
I don't gamble lol
You are deffantly respected in the go kart industry.
I'm also a ff... A wise chief once told me if you have to tap on your badge/accomplishments then it means nothing.
I don't claim to know it all or have done it all but ill sure die hard trying! _________________ Kyle Luttrell
www.Luttrellracing.com
Ionic Edge
Kyle@luttrellracing.com
https://www.facebook.com/IonicEdgeChassis |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Purnell
Joined: 27 Sep 2006 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mike clements wrote: | Robert, Those materials you listed act completely different in the real world.
Kyle, I know better. I, and many people before me, have actually tested this theory. I learned this first about 33 years ago when my new Emmick kart came with a solid 1.250" axle. Within a month, they sent me a new hollow axle that was stiffer. The materials were the same according to Gary Emmick. It had a .250" wall thickness. The .188" wall axles flexed too much.
Don't get me wrong. I am not arguing with you. This is common engineering knowledge. |
Mr. Clements,
Please provide us with some sort of references for the theory that a hollow shaft is stiffer than a solid shaft. If it is a "common engineering knowledge" this shouldn't be too difficult for you.
Are you maybe trying to say that a hollow shaft has a better strength-to-weight ratio than a solid shaft? If this is what you are saying than I will agree with you as THIS is a well known engineering principle but your previous posts seem to be stating that a hollow shaft will be stiffer than a solid shaft with the only parameters being that the shafts are of the same material and outside diameter.
If that is what you are saying I respectfully ask for a reference, i think we would all like to see one.
I think that you are confusing strength-to-weight ratio with simply "strength". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mike clements
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 235 Location: United States, Arizona, San Tan Valley
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
oops  _________________ Began kart racing 1959. Made many friends along the way.
Last edited by mike clements on Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mike clements
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 235 Location: United States, Arizona, San Tan Valley
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just noticed that Margay is building a new offset kart for dirt oval racing. Their front spindle arrangement is quite nice and innovative. They also advertise that the material they are using is 8620, just like I did when building mine.
What are you using ?
The only reason I posted anything about past accomplishments is because by far the readers on this site are 2 cycle racers and mostly TaG racers. They are much younger than myself and therefore have no idea as to who Mike Clements is. I am not bragging. When I get as many National wins as Lynn Haddock, Kyle Adkins or Ronnie Emmick, maybe Then I'll brag.
While working for GM Engineering Staff, we used a lot of strain gauges to test various materials and sizes. On sway bars and torsion bars, there is no doubt at all that the hollow tube is stronger and resists twisting more than the solid. NASCAR sway bars and roll bars are tubular as are in just about any form of racing. It's not a weight thing either. If the sanctioning body thought solid was stronger, they would mandate solid.
We did the exact tests you may be thinking of by placing solid bars of steel, various alloys, in a hyd press with a pressure gauge. Apply pressure to them and measure the deflection at the center of the rod. Let's say a 2" diameter for example. Then try a 2" diameter tube of the same alloy. In every case, the tube resisted the pressure better than the solid bar.
Again, I am not going to argue with anyone. My list of accomplishments is my proof. This worked for me and General Motors and NASCAR and Indy Car and Formula 1 and SCCA, etc. You do what works for you and I'll do what works for me. _________________ Began kart racing 1959. Made many friends along the way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joseph hollinger
Joined: 12 Sep 2002 Posts: 9473 Location: United States, California, san francisco
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can find an online calculator for tubing deflection here: http://www.calculatoredge.com/civil%20engg%20calculator/beam.htm
I entered the data for two tubes. Both 1" OD and 100" long. Both subject to a 100 pound load. Both steel. One solid, one hollow with a .1" wall thickness. As you can see, the hollow tube bends a lot more than the solid tube.
 _________________ A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. -- Winston Churchill. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mike clements
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 235 Location: United States, Arizona, San Tan Valley
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joe, Just for fun, please enter 1.250" O.D. with a .250" wall thickness.
Then compare that to a wall thickness of .188".
These are common numbers for American 1 1/4" axles. Length is 42" for spring racing.
Also, I noticed 70,000 more PSI on the tube as compared to the stress on the solid bar ?
thank you, Mike _________________ Began kart racing 1959. Made many friends along the way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joseph hollinger
Joined: 12 Sep 2002 Posts: 9473 Location: United States, California, san francisco
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Everything else being equal, the tube with the .188 wall bends about .1 more for a 100 pound load.
The field marked "bending stress" is value calculated to reflect the difference in tension at the top of the tube compared to compression at the bottom of the tube. The more a tube is deflected, the greater than value should be. _________________ A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. -- Winston Churchill. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bob prinzo
Joined: 18 Dec 2010 Posts: 43 Location: United States, California, sacramento
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
id like to know which one of you guys argueing with mike are actual educated engineers. _________________ GP9/leopard no.47
wildkart/HPV1 no.10 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|