| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tim Salvino
Joined: 20 Nov 2010 Posts: 257
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would go:
Front Sprocket: 9-25
Rear Sprocket: 53-100
53 is the smallest rear sprocket you can get, so no need to go any lower. And some of the 4 cycle guys run 23 or 24 on the long road courses.
Is it a difficult parameter for you to change in the program? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fabien Michon
Joined: 06 Sep 2011 Posts: 51 Location: France,
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello Tim,
Thank you very much.
The next Karting Tools update will contain the new limits. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fabien Michon
Joined: 06 Sep 2011 Posts: 51 Location: France,
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hello,
Karting Tools 2.4 was released with the following features :
- jetting : new optimized main jet value. Feel free to give your feedback.
- gear ratio limits updated
- several tracks updates. Thanks for your emails !
- new United Kingdom tracks : Tockwith, Woodthorpe, Tilbury, Stretton, Tattershall, Hooton Park
Tim, is the gearing feature ok now ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fabien Michon
Joined: 06 Sep 2011 Posts: 51 Location: France,
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello,
Karting Tools 2.5 has been released with the following features :
- fuel oil mix : ratio in addition to percentage, default mode in settings
- new United Kingdom tracks : Lydd, Red Lodge, Larkhall, Milton Keynes, Pembrey, Rednal
- several tracks updates
- fix rotation bug on Android 4 or later devices
I hope you will enjoy this update !
Thank you |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cory Ross
Joined: 19 Nov 2012 Posts: 137 Location: United States, Colorado, El Jebel
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| With jetting in this app is elevation taken into consideration? Most of the tracks I will be driving on will be well above 5000' in elevation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim McMahon
Joined: 07 Apr 2007 Posts: 2681 Location: United States, St. Paul,
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cory Ross wrote: | | With jetting in this app is elevation taken into consideration? Most of the tracks I will be driving on will be well above 5000' in elevation. |
I believe it allows you to use a local weather station for air denisty. So the closer that station is to the track the better, provided its at a similar altitude.
Been meaning to try this app out... _________________ Live in the midwest and have a TaG, Shifter, KPV, KT100, Animal\LO206, enduro or superkart?
Click here to join the karting festival at Blackhawk, IL June 1st-2nd. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Matt Kaiser
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 25 Location: United States, Nevada,
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since this is a discussion about jetting software/apps, I was wondering if those who are monitoring this thread would critique my jetting spreadsheet that I built. It can be found here:
[url]https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=DEFCD0A07D0B4622!124[/url]
Information about the spreadsheet:
Tab "Observed Data"
-This tab details data that I accumulated at the end of last season. Not a lot of data, but enough to notice a trend regarding the jetting. I noticed that it looked a lot like the density altitude curve when compared to absolute barometric pressure.
Tab "Theoretical"
-Long story short, I built a curve that is density altitude vs. percentage of absolute pressure, multiplied by what the jet "should" be at 0' Density Altitude.
-Cell I3: Theoretical Main Jet at 0' Density Alt. (User Entry)
-Cell K3: Theoretical Pilot Jet at 0' Density Alt. (User Entry)
-Cell A3: Density Altitude Observed (User Entry)
-Cell B3: Theoretical Main Jet at Density Altitude Observed (Calculated)
-Cell E3: Theoretical Pilot Jet at Density Altitude Observed (Calculated)
I'm not sure if this is the correct way to calculate Jetting for a Kehin PWK... I haven't had a chance to check it out yet... Based on my observation the curve looks correct, it will just take some work to adjust the "Theoretical" Jets at 0' Density Altitude (if this is the correct way to jet).
In no way would should anyone use this for their own jetting. This is for informational use only.
With that said, I am interested in hearing what everybody thinks about my logic, calculations, etc.
FLAME ON! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cory Ross
Joined: 19 Nov 2012 Posts: 137 Location: United States, Colorado, El Jebel
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jim McMahon wrote: | I believe it allows you to use a local weather station for air denisty. So the closer that station is to the track the better, provided its at a similar altitude.
Been meaning to try this app out... |
The other day I used this app, it suggested a 178(old Value) and 170(optimized value). Any jet bigger then 165 my spark plug would come out black and I was lucky to get above 11,400rpm. I guess if it is off being on the rich side is the place to be. Just trying to see why it might have given me the numbers it did. I am very new to the carburetor world and changing jets. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fabien Michon
Joined: 06 Sep 2011 Posts: 51 Location: France,
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jim McMahon wrote: | | Cory Ross wrote: | | With jetting in this app is elevation taken into consideration? Most of the tracks I will be driving on will be well above 5000' in elevation. |
I believe it allows you to use a local weather station for air denisty. So the closer that station is to the track the better, provided its at a similar altitude.
Been meaning to try this app out... |
Hello,
I'm sorry to be late, we were hardly working on the iPhone version !
The suggested jets are computed from : temperature, pressure and humidity based on the nearest weather station.
5000' elevation should not be a problem.
Did you tried it ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fabien Michon
Joined: 06 Sep 2011 Posts: 51 Location: France,
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cory Ross wrote: | | Jim McMahon wrote: | I believe it allows you to use a local weather station for air denisty. So the closer that station is to the track the better, provided its at a similar altitude.
Been meaning to try this app out... |
The other day I used this app, it suggested a 178(old Value) and 170(optimized value). Any jet bigger then 165 my spark plug would come out black and I was lucky to get above 11,400rpm. I guess if it is off being on the rich side is the place to be. Just trying to see why it might have given me the numbers it did. I am very new to the carburetor world and changing jets. |
Did you found the good setting ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cory Ross
Joined: 19 Nov 2012 Posts: 137 Location: United States, Colorado, El Jebel
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Every time I have used the app the recommended jet has been a lot bigger then the one needed. I have not bothered using it since because to even use it as a starting point it is to far off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fabien Michon
Joined: 06 Sep 2011 Posts: 51 Location: France,
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cory Ross wrote: | | Every time I have used the app the recommended jet has been a lot bigger then the one needed. I have not bothered using it since because to even use it as a starting point it is to far off. |
Even with the new "optimized value" ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cory Ross
Joined: 19 Nov 2012 Posts: 137 Location: United States, Colorado, El Jebel
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes, last time I used it the optimized value was 170. I had to put a 165 in to get more then 12,000 rpm and it was still running rich. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fabien Michon
Joined: 06 Sep 2011 Posts: 51 Location: France,
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It seems there are problems with the size stamp which Rotax put on their jets because it doesn't stroke with their real size.
Some Rotax resellers are able to measure the jets and give their real sizes.
Karting Tools only provides a suggested value which needs an adjustment.
Are you still using it ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cory Ross
Joined: 19 Nov 2012 Posts: 137 Location: United States, Colorado, El Jebel
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I looked at the app again today and it was suggesting a bigger jet then what was needed. The weather was similar(slightly warmer) to the last time I used it and it was suggesting a 170 or larger jet. With the 165 my spark plug was coming out the perfect tan color.
Also the weather station it is pulling info from is strange. I have not been able to find the weather station anywhere. What is even stranger is the track I am at shares a property line with an airport and the app does not use that weather info. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|