 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
John Benson
Joined: 07 Oct 2010 Posts: 150 Location: United States, Oregon, Grants pass
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Riley and Ian. I never thought there would be that much of a change, then today looking at the mycron ,lap 2 was the fast lap and lap 6 was over a second slower .And at that point I know the tires and driver were doing better! Guess I will have to bite the bullet and add that second rad.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joe lecompte
Joined: 10 Jan 2009 Posts: 113
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Johnny West
Joined: 03 May 2002 Posts: 1182
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 4:49 am Post subject: ign |
|
|
Ian,
I just ran your Ign on Joey's CR. Better every where. Thanks for your help. I'd post the dyno sheet but don't know how to post photos. _________________ Johnny West/West Racing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ian Harrison
Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 1671 Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain), Manchester
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Johnny
Great stuff, I'm glad it's all ok.
If you e-mail the image of the dyno run to me, I'll post it up for you.
Did I send you the other info you asked for. Not sure if I did? Again let me know and I'll e-mail it to you by return.
Best Regards
Ian  _________________ Ian Harrison
Viper Racing UK
www.viper-racinguk.co.uk
sales@viper-racinguk.co.uk
+44 7984 225 564
+44 161 343 2009
Championship winning Superkart race team 1997-2012 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan Davis
Joined: 21 Jul 2002 Posts: 2195 Location: United States, Kansas, Wichita
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought I would add my post and Ian’s response from the thread http://ekartingnews.com/viewtopic.php?t=120783 before I reply below since it applies here.
| Dan Davis wrote: |
Hey Ian! Hope all is well with you!
With regards to the 2004 cylinder. When you say "extra work" I assume you are referring mostly to the horrible exhaust port on that cylinder?
I ask because I am blessed with a 2004 cylinder and yes, it did take plenty of work to get the exhaust port into reasonable shape and also did a fair amount of work on the transfer ports as well.
Otherwise, are there other detrimental characteristics of this cylinder when compared to the 02-03? I am installing this cylinder on 2005 cases by the way....I know, probably not the most effective route to travel but it is what it is. Everything is coming on the cheap ya know.
I've set the 04 cylinder up to run with domed 2005 piston & ring with outer edge of piston approximately .050"/1.27mm (approx. squish clearance) below the cylinder deck with approximately 196 deg. of exh. port timing, and around 134 deg. of transfer port timing. All just best guesses for effective use of the trial and error process knowing full well I'd likely be better off on track by simply purchasing a cylinder/2 piece head (and pipe?) package directly from Viper.....But then there is much less fun & stress in the off season using that method and most likely less fun and additional stress on track. Sadly, this is my nature.
Since I am shooting for least desireable hodge podge of parts from various years , , I ended up with a stock 2003 cylinder head. I will be cutting the mounting surface and outer edge of the squish band flush with the deck of the cylinder and will be increasing the CCV of the from stock a bit to boot. I'll also be cutting the head for o-rings once I get the combustion chamber in shape.....another challenge as the outer o-ring gland won't be concentric with the center of the combustion chamber....enter an NC mill or rotary table /manual mill.
I'll be using a 2005 CR VF3 reed valve (which also took a fair amount of work to modify for strait intake system) and will be fabricating an adapter to accept a Mikuni style intake rubber....I have modeled a couple of iterations via computer software but haven't yet created an actual part for that task as of today.
Any thoughts?.....Possibly my entry here combined with your experienced feedback could be of some help to others as what to do or not to do with these engines. Please try not to fall off your chair due to hysterical laughter, I don't want to be responsible for possible injury!
Perhaps this would be better suited for posting in the "All things CR250" forum. |
| Ian Harrison wrote: | Hi Dan
Great Post!! and good to hear someone getting stuck in and making the best of things!!
In terms of the 2004 cylinder, yes it's the exhaust port with it's flattened top and base that takes a fair bit more carving, however the results can be just as good as the earlier cylinders, just that Gerry was looking at new, so I would be inclined to buy the one that needs the least work to get to your end result.
Conventionally, I would say it's fine to mount the '05 cylinder on '02-'04 cases but the other way round does offer a bit more obstruction of the inlet tract than you would like. But if it's what you got . . . . .Must admit because visually it didn't look too good I never tried it, so I can't actually say how much that costs you in power terms, it may well be smaller than I imagine.
Your figures of 196/134 are good, but I'm surprised that you've got 196 deg exhaust port duration with a piston recession of 1.27mm. I'd have to check when I get in work, but I'm pretty sure that we get 196 with a piston recession of 2.3mm. We then have a head step down the cylinder of 1.0mm that gives us a 1.3mm squish. Perhaps you raised the top of the exhaust by 1mm or perhaps the ports are set a bit higher in the '04 cylinder. Anyway suffice to say, your port timing figures are were they need to be. I'd be interested to know what spacer/gasket combo you have under the cylinder. We would normally have about 2.7mm total thickness to achieve our 2.3 recession, so I'd expect you to have about 1.67mm of gasket/spacer.
Of course, if your cylinder had been skimmed 1.03mm off the top at some time and you were running 2.7mm spacer/gaskets that would also explain it
When using the dome piston, just make sure you have sufficient angle on the squish ramp, so that you don't end up with a negative squish! (getting smaller towards the centre) It's easy done. Just ask Mr. GasGas !!
All the '02-'04 heads have the offset chamber (of course, to match the cylinders) so we have a jig to turn them. Have fun with your one-off, we've been there
Your inlet sounds good, just a lot of work (of which your obviously not afraid), but I do believe that the Mikuni 2-bolt rubber is a bit stiff for a CR250 and particularly on a rough track. I did come across these from my development archive. Just some development shots from when we (in the UK), weren't allowed to remove the lumps and strengthener web at the back of the kickstart shaft. I fabbed up that angled alloy adaptor with hand tools and a pillar drill (I know . . . it shows!!) Those were the days:
Anyway, good luck and please share anything else we may find interesting . . . .carb, ignition, pipe, etc. but, yes, in the all things CR250 topic (10,8504 views and counting!!). The originator of that thread Erik Frank would be smiling at those early inlet shots. My friend, Erik actually made the first (I believe), V-Force 2 adaptor for the crankcase reed CR250 (and made 1 for me). That's it on the left of shot with a special rubber, I had made to replace the defunct RS125 angled rubber!
Happy days
Ian  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan Davis
Joined: 21 Jul 2002 Posts: 2195 Location: United States, Kansas, Wichita
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Firstly, Thanks for the quick and graciously thorough response Ian! Always tops!
OK, here it goes…..it’s gonna be a long one!!
I purchased the 2004 cylinder as a lightly used stock spare at a good price from Troy Miller prior to asking you about your thoughts on cylinders through PM a while back. Yes, you can imagine the look on my face when I saw the exhaust port and I spent plenty of time in that area with the die grinder. I have not yet filled the voids around the locked up power valve flaps and probably won’t for my first running of this engine (I only have the on track time dyno at my disposal) but may be looking into that procedure (as posted by you a while back) to further improve exhaust flow in and out of the cylinder in the future.
I did notice the rear skirt of the 2004 cylinder protruding deep into the intake tract and I performed some surgery on that part of the skirt to accommodate a bit more flow capability. The 2005 cases were also sculpted to increase flow capability while being careful not to enlarge too much with regards to crankcase volume. All mods always experimental of course.
Your assumptions are absolutely correct concerning the port timing values and how I achieved them. I am embarrassed to admit that I did not notice that an aluminum spacer was Yamabonded to the base of the cylinder when I began setting up the cylinder and couldn’t turn back the clock after porting was done.
One of my first decisions after deciding on the 2005 domed piston and single keystone ring (a design I prefer over flat top dual flat ring) and acquiring the inexpensive stock head from an ebay transaction, was to set up the head and squish band flush with cylinder deck as described earlier…..a method I’ve always used on 125 Cyl/head combo’s without head gasket. As you imagined, using stock base gasket was not an option as the piston was well below the cylinder deck. So, to answer your question, I am using whatever spacer thickness that was already attached to the cylinder and fabricated a very thin base gasket (from a standard brown paper grocery sack approx. .006”/.152mm….Ok, stop laughing at me!) and I did have to raise the exhaust and transfer ports a bit. I have plenty of Yamabond on hand so applying the spacer to the cylinder base should it need to be removed isn’t any trouble.
With regards to the cylinder head, I always cut the squish band near to parallel between the piston crown with around 1/2 to 1 degree more angle for safety to prevent the deadly combination you referred to above.
Lucky for me, I have friends here in the Air Capitol (Wichita, Kansas) that have offered to assist me with the machining of the cylinder head. I’ll probably model the combustion chamber to achieve the needed CCV and shape and write a program to cut the chamber, squish band, and O-ring groves in one set-up using a multi tool NC machining center.…..we’ll just see how that goes. We’ll probably do a couple of preliminary cuts on some scrap aluminum plate prior to mounting up the Honda part and with any luck, it’ll be spot on after the machine is turned loose on the head. At that point, the machining can be easily repeated on the same head or a new one if damaged from internal component failure in the future. Plenty of work for sure and certainly not the easy route to take especially if one doesn’t have similar resources at their disposal….but it is a learning experience and all in good fun!
On to the inlet. I was surprised to see the very unfamiliar looking configuration of the VF3 reed valve assembly for 2005 engine when it arrived…..more work for me, YAY! As I’m sure you know, the stuffer inlet is severely offset to the left side for use on the motorcycle. In an effort not to make the stuffer inlet any larger than necessary to keep volume down and try to keep a somewhat linear increase in the intake cross sectional area from carb throat through reed valve and into the crankcase, I decided on grinding the existing opening to the right creating an opening with a dimension of approximately 50-52 mm wide (can’t remember exactly from where I sit right now) which roughly centers the opening in the valve. Next is to machine a 1/2” thick adapter that will blend the round intake boot opening to the new opening in the reed valve. Not what I would consider an ideal transition length but should be adequate for starters. I tend to agree with you about the Mikuni boot possibly being too stiff for rough track applications and will be taking that into consideration. I currently use a Swedetech reed valve assembly on my 125 engine which is also very short and very stiff and have not had excessive issues with the carb coming loose…..not to say it hasn’t happened. Usually the issue was from a broken clamp but that boot is thick and the carb literally snaps in to place prior to tightening the clamp.
A side story: I remember completing at least half of a 30 min. CIK125 race a few years back while holding the carb in place with my right arm and shifting the RH side gear change lever with my left hand while keeping the wheel in position with my left knee. It wasn’t desirable or terribly quick exiting the turns while I downshifted to say the least and had pain in that right shoulder from reaching somewhat behind my body for the rest of the season…..likely stretched or tore ligaments or something. Funny how I didn’t notice that at all during that race and I’d rather not do that again. The leaned back seat in a superkart might make it easier to hold the carb in place but in a competitive race, there is little to no chance at any success at that point.
As of now, my plan is to use a 40.5 mm PWK pump around carb system (due to intake angle) and my current Vortex CDI that I used on my cylinder reed engine (I need to refresh my research on that topic from earlier in this wonderfully informative thread concerning ignition component combination), and my current Viper Racing exhaust system. I haven’t much looked into the carb setup as of now and if there is room between the float bowl and cases, I may machine my reed valve/boot adapter to angle slightly downward to level the float bowl as much as possible. That combined with the updated front engine mount available for case induction Hondas and maybe I can make use of the VHSB?? I just haven’t gotten that far yet.
I hope to get all of this work done before early May and possibly before mid April of this year for my club’s first events. We’ll see how that goes.
Incidentally, I am still preparing an order for you to be placed within the next couple of weeks including several Maverick chassis components that were bent up at HPT incident last season as well as your exhaust header for this 2004 cylinder.
I’ll keep you posted and will report back here as this project progresses.
Thanks again for your input here Ian. It is certainly greatly appreciated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gerry MacNutt
Joined: 14 Apr 2012 Posts: 109 Location: Canada, not USA state,
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dan Davis wrote: | Firstly, Thanks for the quick and graciously thorough response Ian! Always tops!
One of my first decisions after deciding on the 2005 domed piston and single keystone ring (a design I prefer over flat top dual flat ring) |
My personal opinion is I would rather have the heat shedding ability of the 2 rings over a single ring in a motor that's having it's neck rung real hard down a very long straight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ian Harrison
Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 1671 Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain), Manchester
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dan Davis wrote: | OK, here it goes…..it’s gonna be a long one!!
I’ll keep you posted and will report back here as this project progresses.
|
Hi Dan,
Yes, indeed it is and please do keep us up to speed with your project.
If you use the long front mount
And Mod the cases like this:
You can fit any carb you like inc Mikuni, Keihin and Dellorto and with a straight rubber the angle won't be a problem. We now prefer the Mikuni TMX Delta Slide, which we offset and taper bore to 41.5mm and fit a fuel cut-off for direct supply from the DF-52 pump.
Then you could buy one of these . . . . . if it's allowed
Best Regards
Ian  _________________ Ian Harrison
Viper Racing UK
www.viper-racinguk.co.uk
sales@viper-racinguk.co.uk
+44 7984 225 564
+44 161 343 2009
Championship winning Superkart race team 1997-2012 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Reinhardt
Joined: 29 Aug 2002 Posts: 2933 Location: United States, New York, Ossining
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ian Harrison wrote: |
Then you could buy one of these . . . . . if it's allowed
Best Regards
Ian  |
It is in the ESK
2. Cylinders: (FE and ICE): Cylinder manufacturer is open _________________ East Coast Super Kart Series
"This is how we roll!"
www.eastcoastsuperkart.webs.com
CR2 Motorsports
"Home of Cobalt Superkarts"
www.CR2MotorSports.webs.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan Davis
Joined: 21 Jul 2002 Posts: 2195 Location: United States, Kansas, Wichita
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the photo's Ian. That new cylinder/head combo looks very interesting!!
Would you happen to know the P/N of the Mikuni carb boot in your picture above?
Gerry,
Up until this particular build, I have always run cylinder induction CR250's so the double ring flat top piston is all I have experience with. However, I do have plenty of experience with the little brother of the 2005 domed single ring in 125's (also 2005) and am pleased with it's performance as an alternative to the high priced RS piston we used to use. I'll be giving it a try and will let you know how it all goes. Proof will be in the performance/lap time comparisons and realized temps I suppose.
Thanks for your input!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Go Top
|