| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Chris Rock
Joined: 15 Aug 2002 Posts: 342
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
+1 on Brian's comments.
TaG masters has been a multi engine classes since inception. While not perfect (what is) most if not all of the Orgs. have the weights/rules package pretty well sorted out. I can only speak based on running under WKA rules but, taking Daytona as an example there were multiple engine brands running in the front turning the same lap times in masters. Yes it seems the majority choose to run the Leopard package but why would that justify changing to a single engine class? I understand that some people have the resources to bring the “right” engine to specific tracks and that game plan becomes cost prohibitive to many of us. The fix is simple at the local, regional or nation level. Declare your engine brand/make by the first race of the series and that’s the one you have to run for the series. Allow one brand switch during the season and that’s it, if you switch you are on that brand engine the rest of the season. Sounds simple enough.
Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeff Salak
Joined: 01 Aug 2007 Posts: 634 Location: United States, Illinois, Antioch
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| TJ Koyen wrote: | They complain when you put the smaller header on to make the karts "less violent" because it's too slow then. Then they complain when you don't offer a class like Yamaha because it's slower and won't be as violent... When the Yamaha class is offered at a national series, no one runs it and it's dropped. They complain when there are too many engines and no parity in TaG. Then they complain when a series only offers a 1-make TaG class because they can't run it because they don't own that engine.
So THAT'S how we ended up with 20 national classes! |
I dont see any bitching with Masters aged racers with engine parity.
THIS IS A SENIOR PROBLEM!!! That seems to have been pushed into the Masters class as well.
Chris and Brian were the only 2 who actually answered the question.
This is the question!!!
DO MASTER AGED RACERS WANT A LEOPARD ONLY CLASS IN MASTERS?
I dont think Master aged racers want Leopard only. Thats what I would like to find out from Master racers. If Im wrong great!!
Im all with sticking with the engine you use at first race. Not allowing for engine brand changes for the next races.
TJ, who proposed this header thing. It was Mark Coats.
Where did he get his info that Masters wanted this?
Where did he get the info that Master aged racers, the ones that will show up wanted Leopard only?
The numbers in Masters for the most part show an equal amount of engines types at loca, regional, street, and national events.
But yet these NEW series and street race rule makers think this is the way to go Leopard only. I dont think so for us old guys!!!
People complain cause the rules change at a drop of a hat with who ever wants to start a Series or race!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robby Mott Advertiser

Joined: 20 Aug 2001 Posts: 308
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jeff, I believe that coming up with the "perfect" solution is much more difficult than it seems.
Personally, I prefer to enter a race where I will be racing others with the same engine and tires. This allows me to focus on a smaller amount of variables. I will not need to go buy numerous engine packages and a bunch of different types of tires.
With that being said..........I have been impressed with the Tag program as it stands........... I have raced others with different engine packages at different weights and we all are surprising very close in lap times.
At the end of the day...........I would always vote for a 1 engine class. Let it be more about "racing" than equipment. Just my opinion............... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary Osterholt Site Admin
Joined: 18 Jul 2001 Posts: 2771
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jeff Salak wrote: |
I dont see any bitching with Masters aged racers with engine parity.
THIS IS A SENIOR PROBLEM!!! That seems to have been pushed into the Masters class as well.
|
I guess that depends who you ask. At a race like the SuperNationals I heard Master drivers complaining. And look at the results, a Rok TT has won the last three years. And the first Leopard wasn't until 7th or 8th this past SuperNationals?
Even in SKUSA, TaG Senior has become pretty much a Leopard only class. And the weight brackets are based off senior. For Masters they just had 30#, but don't even consider the #/HP. And how adding 30# across the board just screws with the #/HP.
Gary _________________ Website Designs - http://www.godesigns.us |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TJ Koyen
Joined: 03 Oct 2004 Posts: 1461
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jeff Salak wrote: | | TJ Koyen wrote: | They complain when you put the smaller header on to make the karts "less violent" because it's too slow then. Then they complain when you don't offer a class like Yamaha because it's slower and won't be as violent... When the Yamaha class is offered at a national series, no one runs it and it's dropped. They complain when there are too many engines and no parity in TaG. Then they complain when a series only offers a 1-make TaG class because they can't run it because they don't own that engine.
So THAT'S how we ended up with 20 national classes! |
I dont see any bitching with Masters aged racers with engine parity.
THIS IS A SENIOR PROBLEM!!! That seems to have been pushed into the Masters class as well.
Chris and Brian were the only 2 who actually answered the question.
This is the question!!!
DO MASTER AGED RACERS WANT A LEOPARD ONLY CLASS IN MASTERS?
I dont think Master aged racers want Leopard only. Thats what I would like to find out from Master racers. If Im wrong great!!
Im all with sticking with the engine you use at first race. Not allowing for engine brand changes for the next races.
TJ, who proposed this header thing. It was Mark Coats.
Where did he get his info that Masters wanted this?
Where did he get the info that Master aged racers, the ones that will show up wanted Leopard only?
The numbers in Masters for the most part show an equal amount of engines types at loca, regional, street, and national events.
But yet these NEW series and street race rule makers think this is the way to go Leopard only. I dont think so for us old guys!!!
People complain cause the rules change at a drop of a hat with who ever wants to start a Series or race!!!! |
Don't shoot the messenger Jeff. I simply made an observation. Over the past couple months, there have been several topics posted here regarding Masters TaG or Yamaha all arguing against each other. I don't think the Masters drivers know WHAT they want. Seems like no matter what you do with your classes, you'll split the Masters group between those who want to go slower, or those who want to go faster, those who want TaG or those who want Yamaha... The real hard facts here is that so far in WKA (where both these classes were offered), there hasn't been a really huge field of Masters, in TaG OR Yamaha when it was offered.
I don't know the specifics on the Masters header for USPKS or who proposed it or where the information came from. Why don't you send Mark Coats an email and ask him?
And not sure how the Masters have the ability to defy the laws of physics and disregard the differences in weight and horsepower between engines that exists within the Senior class. Must be some kind of superpower that is granted to you on your 35th birthday. _________________ T.J. Koyen
OKTANE VISUAL - Custom Helmet Paint & Graphic Design
www.oktanevisual.com
www.facebook.com/oktanevisual
--------------------------
DB Motorsports
Exprit/Leopard |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ken Schilling
Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 1351
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Chris Rock wrote: | ...The fix is simple at the local, regional or nation level. Declare your engine brand/make by the first race of the series and that’s the one you have to run for the series. Allow one brand switch during the season and that’s it, if you switch you are on that brand engine the rest of the season. Sounds simple enough.
Chris |
Hello Chris,
Great idea!!!
SKUSA has had this rule in place for the last number of years.
p.s. - SKUSA has a similar rule in place for Spec Honda. You must declare a cylinder year (Early/97-99 or Late/00-02) but you cannot change it during that year. _________________ Ken Schilling
#21x / S4 / ProKart Challenge (PKC)
SKUSA Data Administrator
Good luck is where preparation and opportunity meet!!!
The opinions I express are mine alone and do not reflect those of any organization of which I am a member. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Keith Buffo
Joined: 30 Nov 2007 Posts: 308 Location: United States, Massachusetts, Stoneham
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[qutoe]This is the question!!!
DO MASTER AGED RACERS WANT A LEOPARD ONLY CLASS IN MASTERS[/quote]
My answer today: No. I want as many people to race against as possible. I have a Rotax, some have Leopards, others have others. Few masters have more than one. In road race I find the parody to be fair... not totally equal corner to corner, but close enough on the watch when we get back to the stripe - a good thing. As shockingly thin as all the fields are, I keep hoping against reality that TaG racers will stick together to have fields large enough to attract more competitors. However...
Other racers and promotors answer: Yes. Especially when it happens to be what they have or what they sell. Problem is that we've taken a grid that's already too thin and split it in two. I believe this has stunted karting overall because small grids lead to smaller grids. However, after years of both TaG and Stock Leopard classes being stuck in the basement, there seems to be some signs of growth in Leopard. So...
My possible answer next year: Yes. I want as many people to race against as possible. But it would be with very heavy feet I'd follow knowing the unnecessary pain this trend inflicts upon racers with smaller budgets and local shops that have worked hard to support the sport through other packages. But I guess that's just how it goes in the big-bad world, so I harbor absolutely no ill feelings toward the folks behind the Leopard for also supporting the sport but with a package that seems to be building momentum in my corner of karting.
That said, if I do push out onto the grid next season with a Stock Leopard and find the field split by an X-30 class...
(As always, these opinions are completely my own, and do not represent any organizations or shops that are nice enough not to turn off the lights and lock the door when I show up.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Rock
Joined: 15 Aug 2002 Posts: 342
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Ken,
Didn't realize SKUSA does that now. How does it seem to work out? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ken Schilling
Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 1351
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Chris Rock wrote: | Hey Ken,
Didn't realize SKUSA does that now. How does it seem to work out? |
Thanks for the response Chris. It works great and keeps costs down.
p.s. - As far as I know there hasn't been any complaints about it which is probably the best evidence of success!!!  _________________ Ken Schilling
#21x / S4 / ProKart Challenge (PKC)
SKUSA Data Administrator
Good luck is where preparation and opportunity meet!!!
The opinions I express are mine alone and do not reflect those of any organization of which I am a member. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Koyen Advertiser

Joined: 26 Nov 2002 Posts: 1571
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ken Schilling wrote: | | Chris Rock wrote: | Hey Ken,
Didn't realize SKUSA does that now. How does it seem to work out? |
Thanks for the response Chris. It works great and keeps costs down.
p.s. - As far as I know there hasn't been any complaints about it which is probably the best evidence of success!!!  |
This was asked for by the racers in WKA, and proposed by the appropriate committee, then shot down somewhere along the line because "it would be too hard to enforce". _________________ High Quality American Made kart stands. Available direct to you or through one of our many dealers.
www.kartlift.com
Toll Free: 877-777-8020 or 608-235-4761 anytime
www.facebook.com/kartlift |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ken Schilling
Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 1351
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tim Koyen wrote: | | Ken Schilling wrote: | | Chris Rock wrote: | Hey Ken,
Didn't realize SKUSA does that now. How does it seem to work out? |
Thanks for the response Chris. It works great and keeps costs down.
p.s. - As far as I know there hasn't been any complaints about it which is probably the best evidence of success!!!  |
This was asked for by the racers in WKA, and proposed by the appropriate committee, then shot down somewhere along the line because "it would be too hard to enforce". |
Tim,
At the race registration level) I do all of the SKUSA race entries and easily keep track of the TaG S & TaG M engine(s) for each driver. A relatively simple Excel spreadsheet to keep track of the initial engine declaration at the beginning of the season then document any engine brand/type change as their first and only engine change allowed during the season. This rule applies for each individual SKUSA series (ProKart Challenge & Pro Tour). SKUSA has a great online race entry which really simplifies this, but Patti also does manual pre-race entries when needed.
http://www.skusastore.com/product-p/pkc-entry.htm
At the track level) First, the driver has to fill out the SKUSA "honor system" tech sheet which also has an engine declaration spot to fill in and turns it in on the grid before qualifying. Second, the scale person has a spreadsheet with the driver/engine/class combo listed for double checking.
That's it!
p.s. - "Honor system" means that SKUSA doesn't have pre-tech that each driver & kart have to go through. If you've raced at any SKUSA PKC or Pro Tour race you know how this works as it saves a lot of time and energy on everyone's part. _________________ Ken Schilling
#21x / S4 / ProKart Challenge (PKC)
SKUSA Data Administrator
Good luck is where preparation and opportunity meet!!!
The opinions I express are mine alone and do not reflect those of any organization of which I am a member. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marco Oldhafer
Joined: 05 May 2009 Posts: 53 Location: United States, New Jersey,
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Single engine programs are better for the growth of the sport...... The #1 reason it will keep the sport simple!! Now I realize everyone here knows the 800 page rule book that comes with our sport. But these complex rules and regulations inhibit the growth of the sport. For one minute put yourself in the shoes of a beginner!!!
Silly question but what other sport has games special for the elderly?? I promote the F-Series and we offer no masters class but we have light and heavy and for the most part the masters age group do gravitate towards the heavier group. The masters class is not really needed since the program divides itself naturally....... without calling someone old at the age of 32
Karting needs less classes so racers can have more track time!!!!! _________________ The F-Series Gearup Challenge
www.f1series.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joe Brizzolara
Joined: 27 Jan 2009 Posts: 506 Location: United States, New Jersey,
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't want to get locked into a single engine format in WKA. Either in sprint or road racing. I'm 225 pounds and I can't make weight no mater what engine I'm racing. So I may as well pick one that had more power and will not put me at as much as a disadvantage because of my weight.
If we want to have decent fields we need to allow different engines. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brian McHattie
Joined: 28 Jan 2002 Posts: 386
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joe Brizzolara wrote: | I don't want to get locked into a single engine format in WKA. Either in sprint or road racing. I'm 225 pounds and I can't make weight no mater what engine I'm racing. So I may as well pick one that had more power and will not put me at as much as a disadvantage because of my weight.
If we want to have decent fields we need to allow different engines. |
Joe:
I'm 225 at the moment as well and with my ROK TT, Exprit 32mm (OTK Kart) and stock Vortex radiator I come in right at weight if not a few pounds under having to weigh #405. If there is anything I can do to help, just ask..... _________________ Brian McHattie
www.dbmotorsportsonline.com
all your graphic needs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marco Oldhafer
Joined: 05 May 2009 Posts: 53 Location: United States, New Jersey,
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joe Brizzolara wrote: | I don't want to get locked into a single engine format in WKA. Either in sprint or road racing. I'm 225 pounds and I can't make weight no mater what engine I'm racing. So I may as well pick one that had more power and will not put me at as much as a disadvantage because of my weight.
If we want to have decent fields we need to allow different engines. |
Joe,
Sounds like you are opposed to a weight and small classes ?? What I was trying to say is that we need to make the sport simple so we can attract more people to become racers. I have advertised for karting for many years and the main issue seems to be, the many choices! It start to look difficult, and for parents with children interested it is more than they want to deal with so they decide on another sport. That is why Motocross is bigger....... _________________ The F-Series Gearup Challenge
www.f1series.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|