| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jimmy Moore
Joined: 26 Jul 2001 Posts: 664
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2001 3:54 am Post subject: Differences in 4 Hole Cans |
|
|
| They are all about the same. Get the 4 holes down, it makes less noise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Thompson
Joined: 27 Jul 2001 Posts: 37 Location: Greenwood IN
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2001 4:49 am Post subject: Differences in 4 Hole Cans |
|
|
| We would probably run the 4 down but our club rules call for the 90 degree can. I was just wondering if anyone had done any testing. Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Mayhew
Joined: 31 Jul 2001 Posts: 209
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2001 5:57 am Post subject: Differences in 4 Hole Cans |
|
|
I haven't seen much of a difference in either one over the other. I would run the 90 degree one as it will not put as much exhaust on your rear axle bearings.
David Mayhew  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kevin nelson
Joined: 05 Sep 2001 Posts: 43 Location: United States, Wisconsin,
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2001 7:54 am Post subject: Differences in 4 Hole Cans |
|
|
| There is a difference between the two other than noise. I would definetly test. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Thompson
Joined: 27 Jul 2001 Posts: 37 Location: Greenwood IN
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2001 10:37 am Post subject: Differences in 4 Hole Cans |
|
|
| Has anyone out there done any comparison testing on the power output between the SSX and SSX V cans? Just curious, have been told that the 4 holes up is faster than the 90 degree one. TIA, Dave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Wehrheim
Joined: 18 Jul 2001 Posts: 1196 Location: United States, Georgia, Atlanta
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2001 11:06 am Post subject: Differences in 4 Hole Cans |
|
|
| You do not want the holes down, unless you want to replace your bearings. WKA mandates 90 degree holes. I have never heard the noise being a problem, but check with your local rules |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ron brolley
Joined: 30 Jul 2001 Posts: 170 Location: United States, Pennsylvania, Mountaintop
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2001 12:39 pm Post subject: Differences in 4 Hole Cans |
|
|
What ever you do dont run the can with the exhaust outlets down. The bearings get enough wear and tear to begin with plus if you add in exhaust heat that equals trouble. Most of the karts i see with them run the holes up.
Ron |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sean Robbins
Joined: 23 Aug 2001 Posts: 474 Location: United States, Alaska, Anchorage
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2001 12:08 am Post subject: Differences in 4 Hole Cans |
|
|
Furthermore, another problem with running the holes down is that you will be blowing hot exhaust straight onto you clutch. I ran this setup (can with holes down) once upon a time and the clutch heated up to the point where the studs holding the rear sprocket on came out.
Aim the holes up and invest in a good set of earplugs (the hearing aid booth at a Costco can make you a custom-molded set for a very reasonable cost). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Doll
Joined: 18 Jul 2001 Posts: 2644 Location: United States, Washington,
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2001 6:02 am Post subject: Differences in 4 Hole Cans |
|
|
If any of you are wondering why the IKF mandated the SSX-V can (after a one year transistion period), this is why. If there are a several versions of the same "spec" pipe/muffler/etc. then everyone trys to figure out which version works best. Sort of ruins the whole concept of "spec".
BTW - RLV originally created the SSX-V at the request of the IKF to be at least as quiet as the SSX with the holes pointed down, while eliminated the problem of baking rear axle components. No, it was not a conspiracy to force everyone to buy new cans so RLV could make money.
Tim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|