| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Steve Kilsdonk
Joined: 09 May 2002 Posts: 137
|
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gregg boyce wrote: |
Why bother going for extra laps (except the 1st stop for a clearer pitlane? You can't make it on 2 stops (you have to make lap 67). We made it to 63 in '06. But we were pretty slow too. If you can't make it much past 50 then why risk running out of fuel? You don't get a big enough advantage IMO. I guess I preaching to the choir NOW
GB |
Simple really. You stop later and later so that the last stop is very short! Just a splash and dash to make the last 20 laps if you're gaining 10 laps at each stop let's say. I wasn't in the pits as I was signalling for Team 4 cycle, but if you cut your pit time in half, you just saved what, 10-20 seconds?
Makes sense about race form vs. qualifying form. Less bottom end will kill you in the race with traffic making you slow down more, carrying less momentum. That and less power off the turn makes it harder and more risky to make the passes at the end of the straight, even if you have more top end. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gregg boyce
Joined: 27 Jul 2004 Posts: 1143 Location: United States, Tennessee, nashville
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Steve,
I think you missed my point. I said that pushing it on fuel wasn't worth the downside risk of running out of fuel and potentially loosing many laps to save 10-15 secs in a race where, until this year, the winner has had about a lap lead. But for your arguement let's say you went to lap 55 on each stint. Your last stop would come on lap 165. You have 15 less laps on the final stint or about 27% less fuel needed. If you stop took 1 min you save maybe 16 sec tops. Also, if you fill up every stop you'll have to put in 5 laps less fuel on each stop saving about the same amount of time but split over 3 stops. Either way I think its a wash, but you don't have the risk of running out if you don't strech it.
BTW, very few can make it 60 laps on a tank....if they're legal.
$.02
GB _________________ My imaginary friend says your crazy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Conlin
Joined: 22 Oct 2002 Posts: 465 Location: United States, Ohio, Hilliard
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with your analysis 100% Gregg.
| gregg boyce wrote: | | BTW, very few can make it 60 laps on a tank....if they're legal. |
In fact, we had worse fuel mileage (no, not saying how much) than last year. Wondering if anyone else saw an increase in fuel consumption and if so what theories there are for why. _________________ Jim
jim@conlinss.com
Adrenaline Fix Karting/Conlin SpeedSports, LLC
Race Prep|Trackside Services|Arrive & Drives
www.ConlinSS.com
Facebook: www.Facebook.com/AdrenalineFixKarting |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Livengood
Joined: 24 Jul 2001 Posts: 2438 Location: United States, Pennsylvania, Da Burgh
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
We saw 57 laps on one tank and had a fair amount of fuel left. 60 laps most likely would not have been a problem. We checked our volume with the "official tank" and our tank actually held slightly less fuel. I think it is going to be really interesting to see karters work on fuel efficiency for these races. _________________ http://www.Chrislivengood.net
http://www.Work-Racing.com
http://www.OurZeal.com
http://www.Karting101.com
"Auto racing, helping white guys get laid since 1887!!!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom Sekey
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1077 Location: United States, Palau,
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I guarentee you could get 60 laps + on a tank of gas and be legal. You wont be very fast though. Gear and jetting will do it along with driving conservativly. At least with a leopard. The only way it would really matter would be if your trying for a 2 stop race. The loss of lap time out weighed the time of one pit stop. We did all the math and testing in practice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CJ Lintner
Joined: 03 Jul 2007 Posts: 81
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tom, Zach fell back at the beginning of the race due to contact with another kart. He fell back to about 15th/20th, then worked his way back up to seventh before his stint was over. Like I said before the kart was competitive in both qualifying and the race =) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom Sekey
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1077 Location: United States, Palau,
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
On lap 47 Kyle over took the MRP for 18th spot and than the pits started cycling through. Our mychron was broke so Kyle pitted early. Look at the lap chart on my laps. It tells the whole story. You can also see every lap time of every driver too. The MRP was averaging in the 1:07's where the DB team and other front qualifyers were averaging mid 1:06's. What did you guys do to that rotax in qualifying to go so fast?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan Schultz
Joined: 14 Oct 2001 Posts: 162 Location: United States, Illinois, Bolingbrook
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| As someone else pointed out, the Arrow Karts had an impressive showing. What model Arrow kart are people using or are there a few different chassis they use? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Evan Batt
Joined: 06 Dec 2007 Posts: 134 Location: United States, Indiana,
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| We used the AX9 CIK. However, the winning kart was an AX9 4S. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Livengood
Joined: 24 Jul 2001 Posts: 2438 Location: United States, Pennsylvania, Da Burgh
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Arnold
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Posts: 1092 Location: United States, Kentucky,
|
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:02 pm Post subject: fuel mileage |
|
|
How can some go about 42laps & others 50+ laps before needing gas?
Is it jetting, fuel tank size, driving style, engine set up or what?
Mike |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Maurini
Joined: 11 Jan 2003 Posts: 286 Location: United States, Indiana, Indianapolis
|
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mike,
I worked for Spencer Pigot and Cyndie Allemann during the Robopong. We made it a goal to go to lap 50 in the first stint, lap 102 the second stint, lap 154 the third stint to ensure the last stint was only 46 laps and if we needed to battle for the win we could have. The First stint was only 50 laps in length due to the three pace laps (need to take those into effect).
We probably could have gone another 2 - 3 laps per stint but why risk it. We concentrated on keeping close to the front of the pack while conserving gas as much as possible and both drivers did a great job....Even with all of that, they were able to turn the fastest race lap.
Gas consumption comes down to three things Gear/RPM, Driving Style and Jetting...We did not race with the same gear we qualified on nor were the drivers driving nearly as hard. Jetting was similar but the main concentration was to draft, let off 10 feet early, get on the gas 10 feet later....SAVE FUEL. We lowered our max RPM to the target RPM that we were hoping to achieve and all was going well....A rear gear failure 18 laps left with a 35 second lead cost us the win and a $5000 pay day.
This is one of the most fun races every year but also the toughest to win. Competition is tough and your equipment has to last. After working with the winning team in 2007, we thought we would take the same approach this year but nothing is guaranteed....I'll be back for sure in 2009! _________________ Mike Maurini
317.270.8723
Mike@RaceTechDevelopment.com
www.RaceTechDevelopment.com
_______________________________________
My opinions and thoughts are my own, and are not shared by any organizations or companies that I may be associated with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Arnold
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Posts: 1092 Location: United States, Kentucky,
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:25 am Post subject: Cyndie? |
|
|
Michael,
I was watching your team effort and was following them closely.
I most impressed by Cyndie's speed for a person who had not raced there before.
Do you know what she is doing now and her plans for '09?
Thanks for the info. on the fuel mileage.
Mike |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Maurini
Joined: 11 Jan 2003 Posts: 286 Location: United States, Indiana, Indianapolis
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 6:21 am Post subject: Re: Cyndie? |
|
|
| Mike Arnold wrote: | Michael,
I was watching your team effort and was following them closely.
I most impressed by Cyndie's speed for a person who had not raced there before.
Do you know what she is doing now and her plans for '09?
Thanks for the info. on the fuel mileage.
Mike |
Mike,
She was quite good and her feedback was one of the best. Her and Spencer made a great team. We got to the track on Thursday to break in and learn the facility....after 2 - 3 sessions she was right there running the same times as the quick drivers. Spencer has always proven his speed at New Castle so he was able to help Cyndie where needed not to mention some driving instrution from Jay Howard made my job fairly easy.
I am not sure what her plans are for 2009. _________________ Mike Maurini
317.270.8723
Mike@RaceTechDevelopment.com
www.RaceTechDevelopment.com
_______________________________________
My opinions and thoughts are my own, and are not shared by any organizations or companies that I may be associated with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Melissa Wagner
Joined: 07 Oct 2007 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:38 am Post subject: fuel stops |
|
|
Derek made it 55 laps on the first stop. He had enough fuel left to make it another 5 laps, so next year look for him to stop at 60 laps. _________________ Melissa Wagner
www.WagnerRaceProducts.com
"Simulate to Stimulate" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|